Viromo.

White-label · for law firms

The factual groundwork for your e-commerce practice.

I audit the public legal pages of your clients — or your prospects — and hand you a factual file: missing clauses, the exact provisions at stake. A concrete reason to start the conversation, and a head start on the work. You advise, draft and sign.

Discuss a partnership → See how
01 /

The problem isn’t the law. It’s opening the conversation.

Most online stores run outdated terms, incomplete privacy policies and non-compliant cookie banners. You already know this. But without a precise finding, it’s hard to explain to a director why they should revisit documents that have “worked” for years.

I turn that vagueness into verifiable facts, provision by provision. It’s the trigger for a meeting — and the starting point of a compliance file.

02 /

What I do — and what I don’t.

A deliberate line. I produce factual, documentary findings; legal advice and the drafting of acts stay with the lawyer. In regulated markets such as France, that work is reserved to qualified lawyers — I never cross it.

Your firm

The law

Legal qualification, advice, drafting and validation of the terms, privacy policy and legal notice. The client relationship, the signature and the responsibility stay yours.

Viromo

The facts and the technical layer

Factual audit of the public pages, each finding tied to the relevant provision, a technical brief of the points to cover, plus integration and hardening — no interpretation of the law.

  • I audit the public legal pages of your clients or prospects (terms, privacy, cookies, legal notice) with analysis scripts, and extract factual findings tied to the provisions. That’s your reason to open the relationship.
  • I prepare a technical brief — the list of points and provisions to cover for compliance. Your firm drafts, validates and signs; I draft no legal act.
  • I speed up the file: you save hours of review and walk into the meeting with concrete, already-documented arguments.

The scope, plainly. Viromo gives no legal advice and drafts no act. I flag factual gaps and cite the provisions; qualification, drafting and responsibility stay with the firm.

03 /

A real file, anonymised.

A French online store (wooden toys, limited company, B2C). Audited from the outside, with no back-office access. 12 findings: 4 critical, 5 high, 3 minor. Identity, numbers and technical identifiers removed.

Critical
No statutory guarantee of conformity disclosed in the T&Cs Sale of Goods Dir. (EU) 2019/771 — Among the most-sanctioned omissions; the consumer is unaware of the two-year remedy, at the seller’s cost.
Critical
No consumer mediation / ADR body named ADR Dir. 2013/11/EU + ODR Reg. 524/2013 — Mandatory in B2C; one of the first points flagged by consumer associations.
Critical
Advertising trackers fired before any consent ePrivacy Dir. 2002/58/EC art. 5(3) + GDPR — Banner with no equal “Reject all” = dark pattern (EDPB 03/2022); fines up to €20M or 4% of turnover.
Critical
No compliant privacy policy (references to repealed provisions) GDPR art. 13–14 — Mandatory information (legal basis, retention, rights) absent — first thing a regulator checks.
High
T&Cs built on outdated law, no model withdrawal form Consumer Rights Dir. 2011/83/EU art. 9 — Return “subject to the seller’s approval” is unenforceable; a missing form extends the period.
High
Refund “within 15 days” instead of 14 + risky return clauses Consumer Rights Dir. 2011/83/EU art. 13 — Statutory deadline exceeded; “at the buyer’s risk” clauses are deemed unfair.
High
Intra-EU VAT number missing from the legal notice e-Commerce Dir. 2000/31/EC art. 5 — Formal breach of the online seller-identification duty.
High
No HTTP security headers (HSTS, CSP…) GDPR art. 32 + OWASP — Aggravating factor in a data breach; XSS / clickjacking exposure.
High
Promotions without the lowest price of the prior 30 days Price Indication Dir. 98/6/EC (Omnibus) — Potentially misleading reduction; one of the most-checked points in e-commerce.
Minor
Obsolete data-protection registration cited GDPR (prior notification abolished, 2018) — No legal effect, but signals documents not revised since the GDPR.
Minor
Inconsistent delivery scope + undated T&Cs Consumer Rights Dir. (pre-contractual information) — Ambiguous information; impossible to know which version the customer agreed to.
Minor
Misleading “30 days” returns wording Unfair Commercial Practices Dir. 2005/29/EC — The “30 days” masks the real 14-day withdrawal right.

Each point is publicly verifiable, with no login. This is the file I hand you; you turn it into a legal opinion and compliant documents, signed by the firm.

04 /

How white-label works, in four steps.

1

You point me to a store

A client’s, or a prospect you’re targeting. A URL is enough; no access required.

2

I deliver a factual file

Findings, quotes, provisions — under your firm’s letterhead. Within 3–5 business days.

3

You advise and draft; I integrate

You issue the opinion and draft the documents. If needed, I handle the store’s technical compliance.

4

You bill your service

Viromo stays your technical supplier, invisible to the end client if you prefer.

05 /

Partner pricing.

The partner rate is what you pay; suggested resale is indicative — you set your own price. Volume discounts apply. Legal work (advice, drafting) is not included: it stays with the firm.

Essential
from €390
Suggested resale ≈ €690
  • Legal-pages audit
  • Findings + provisions cited
  • Report under your letterhead
Recommended
Full
from €790
Suggested resale ≈ €1,490
  • Five areas, 50+ control points
  • Technical brief of points to cover
  • Complete factual file
Full + integration
from €1,290
Suggested resale ≈ €2,290
  • Everything in “Full”
  • Technical integration of documents
  • Post-deployment verification

Indicative prices, excl. VAT, to confirm by scope.

Factual groundwork for your firm

Verifiable findings to open the conversation, a brief to move fast, and the law kept entirely on your side.

Discuss a partnership → jacob@viromo.eu